"I think there's a very strong possibility that it is biased against schools set in poorer communities, and we have to make sure that is corrected, and to do that we need to get accurate measures of school performance," he said.Īustralian Education Union federal president Angelo Gavrielatos says the Grattan Institute's plan to focus on student performance goes some way towards meeting his organisation's concerns. "In the current system the first school, who has the higher original scores, receives more attention as being more successful." 'Biased against poor'ĭr Jensen says the My School site is an important first step but, in its current form, it only looks at a snapshot of student performance rather than student development and is biased. If we focus on student progress like the system that we advocate, the second school is recognised for the contribution that they've made to the student. "In the second school, a student scores five out of 10 in the first year, but seven out of 10 two years later. "If you consider the example of just two schools, in the first school a year three student scores, say, eight out of 10 on an exam, and then two years later they score eight out of 10 again. "It's student progress that we are most interested in. "The focus on student progress provides a much more accurate measure of school performance," Dr Jensen said. The Institute's program director of school education, Dr Ben Jensen, says their plan gives parents the information they need. The Institute today launched an alternate plan, which uses the same NAPLAN data but looks at student progress rather than test results. The Grattan Institute says while it supports the push to make more information on schools public, My School will not show how students' grades change over time. Our primary concern rests with the fact that the information on the website will be used to create simplistic and damaging league tables," Mr Gavrielatos said. "Our primary concern is not with the website. My School will use data from the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), which all students do in years three, five, seven and nine.Īustralian Education Union federal president Angelo Gavrielatos says the union has voted to boycott the next round of NAPLAN testing in May. "It will certainly enable us to compare similar schools, and it certainly enables us to know where the most disadvantaged school communities are," Ms Gillard said. She says it will also be a good resource for the Government. However, several parent groups have supported the proposal to provide information on school performance.įederal Education Minister Julia Gillard says it will provide parents and the community with accurate information, allowing them to be their own judge. The Education Union says it will unfairly stigmatise disadvantaged schools, and the Secondary Principals Council says it fails to include crucial data about school funding. My School, scheduled to be launched tomorrow, has already come under heavy criticism. Independent policy think-tank the Grattan Institute has added to growing criticism of the Federal Government's My School website, saying it will not give an adequate assessment of a school's performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |